The more expensive you are, the better? 4K TV has not achieved value for money

Once again in the annual TV shopping season, the “holiday price bargaining” will soon come. This year for consumers, is it necessary to pay more money to buy a 4K smart TV? The most direct and most merciless answer is - "Better not buy, you buy is just a high-end TV Just like the previous TV market, complexity, confusion and hype are intertwined. No TV maker or clerk can tell you that 4K TV is worth the money. They just use slow motion, high quality demo videos, and "human-made" comparisons and other tricks to convince you to spend more money.



4k TV PK1080P Who is the best choice


Why 4K TV has not achieved value for money

Take two 50-inch TVs, one with 4K resolution, priced at 999 US dollars (about 6119 yuan), the other standard 1080p resolution, priced at 899 US dollars (about 5506 yuan). The quality of the two TVs is almost the same. However, we still recommend that you buy 1080p TV. The reason is that the 4K resolution does not show its obvious advantages in terms of vision in the range of conventional viewing distances (about 2 meters or more) and display screen size.

When we were sitting in the living room watching 4K TVs, most users did not appreciate the visual quality beyond 1080p resolution. The American technology website CNET discovered through a large number of 4K TV evaluations that 1080p resolution TV and 4K TV have not changed much. The improvement of 4K TV appears almost negligible. In other words, 4K TV did not allow 1080p to improve.

When will 4K TV be worthwhile?

The reader may have noticed that the above-mentioned "4K TV and 1080p resolution TVs do not show improvement in picture quality". In the current TV market, TV manufacturers provide their best LCD TV picture quality in 4K TV. In other words, the best LCD TVs are equivalent to 4K TVs, and they do not show much improvement in resolution.


When will 4K TV be worthwhile?

Take Samsung, the best-selling television brand, as an example. In the United States, Samsung offers several 1080p and 4K televisions, but the only non-surfaced TV that has made significant improvements in picture quality is the 4K HU8550 series. This is a good 4K TV. If you can accept its high price, then it is a good choice. Another product, the Samsung F8500 Plasma TV, is also a better choice. Although this TV lacks 4K elements, it provides better picture quality at a lower price.

For those who watch TV within 2 meters, 4K TV is an option, especially for those who plan to use the 4K display as an extra-large PC monitor. If this is the case, it would be worth the money to buy more of a 4K TV. If a 4K display is applied to the game field, games and images can be sharper than other video content.

The price

Most TV buyers want to buy the best quality TV. This year, Vizio won the CNET's value product competition. The company's M-series and E-series TVs offer great picture quality. Both regional 1080p resolution TVs use regional dimming. In contrast, the M Series products are even better at CNET website testing. Although they offer "cheap" prices, consumers are sure to be excited about their quality.

We expect the 4K VizioP series TVs to bring better picture quality, but that didn't happen. During the holiday season this year, the company will make major price cuts on other TVs, and the lowest-priced 4K TV may appear. However, despite this, these 4K TVs still have higher prices than the M Series.

However, Vizio may release software updates for P-series TVs to enhance the quality of the TV. However, it is not clear at this specific point in time.

In addition to Vizio, other TV makers are also launching lower-priced 4K TVs. The CNET website believes that most of these 4K TVs offer better picture quality than the best LCD TVs.

Lack of 4K content

TVs have been around for a long time. You may wonder if 1080p TVs will be eliminated in the next 5-10 years. The answer is: No.

The only reason to eliminate 1080p TVs is that these TVs cannot play 4K content. Today, 4K content is limited to a few streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon, as well as expensive content from Sony. Neither Xbox One nor PS4 can broadcast 4K content, and there is no 4K Blu-ray or TV channel on the market. It may take years for TV stations and producers to replace all HD devices with 4K cameras and devices.

Even if they do, there is no guarantee that the quality of these 4K wireless TV programs will be better than HD programs. Even now, there are differences in the picture quality of HD channels. This is mainly due to the limitation of broadband rather than the difference in resolution. For example, television channels that viewers love to watch (such as Fox, ESPN, and ABC) actually play 720p-resolution content, not 1080i or 1080p.

At the same time, standard 1080p TVs purchased in the coming years are also feasible. To be sure, they may not be able to play the best 4K content in 4K resolution, but it's hard to see the difference between them.

A recent test done on the CNET website found that Netflix 4K streaming content differs significantly from 1080p streaming media content.

Who is the best choice?

You may still think, "I still need a 4K TV. It has more pixels, but you don't want it to be more expensive than a 1080p TV."

The decline in the price of 4K TVs is very fast and there does not seem to be a slowing trend. Next year, 4K resolution TV prices will become cheaper and smaller. 1080p LCD TVs will begin to enter the "low price" era.

However, in 2014, there were many low-cost 1080p TVs that performed well, and some products performed even better than 4K TVs. To be sure, 4K TV is better than 1080p TV in sound quality and design, but this advantage is not obvious. Unless you apply it to other high-end markets, or use 4K TV as a large PC computer display, 1080P TV is still a better choice in this holiday season.

Recommended installation sofa butler Download: http://app.shafa.com/



Posted on