The Radeon RX470 4G, which has been available for more than a month, is a 1500-level graphics card and will inevitably carry the great hopes of ordinary gamers. I believe that players who keep watching the currency have also read many Radeon RX470 4G tests. It is not difficult to find that many evaluations will conduct detailed tests for large-scale stand-alone games, but stand-alone games are less interactive, and the legitimate one-time input costs are “higherâ€, so many players will choose “piracy†and use stand-alone as a kind of Temporary experience, so I think the real game time will still be dominated by online games.
Blizzard understands its ways. Starting from World of Warcraft, it gradually develops its battlefield and makes its main games become benchmarks for the industry. It not only solves the problem of piracy, but also can make more profit by using fragmented charging strategies.
Especially World of Warcraft and Watchman Pioneer are two online games.
World of Warcraft, which lasted 11 years, has now been updated to version 7.0. Even during this period of similar and exotic online games, the enthusiasm of the game is still not reduced. It can be seen from the charging policies of Netease point card change month card. Blizzard and NetEase are still full of confidence in the 11-year-old World of Warcraft.
What's more, this year's daring games have to be watched by pioneers. Even though the threshold fee is “as high as†198, it can't stop it from errating the market share of DOTA games, and it also marks the downfall of the first-person shooting online gaming market. cardiac.
Blizzard's optimization of the game can be described as miraculous, low-effect low-profile can also be smooth, high-effect high-catching, there are different levels of special effects, there is a clear distinction between the needs of the configuration, which is why I choose Blizzard games for testing reasons one.
OK, less nonsense, we entered the testing phase.
Let's take a look at the platform for this test.
For the RX470 4G i7-4790 is still able to deal with, must be legendary performance is equivalent to the top non-public GTX970. Having said that, I need to introduce the protagonist of this test - DATALADN RX470 4G X-Serial.
This video card internal packaging is relatively simple, similar to the public version of the RX480, only the CD and instructions â—¢
Overall, it is still quite beautiful, and the design style is hard to read.
The graphics card is 28CM long, which belongs to a long queue. The small chassis may be slightly difficult to install.
Graphics cards with backplanes are always well-received by players, but this also shows that this graphics card will not be the cheapest.
The "faith" lamp is now a place where manufacturers are trying hard.
8PIN's power interface shows that this video card has increased power supply, and the actual internal situation cannot be known because I did not disassemble it.
The label on the selling box is relatively clear, but there is no place for outstanding performance.
With my set, the effect of the machine is still very coordinated.
DATALAND RX470 4G X-Serial Parameters
FS score 12135â—¥
FSE score 5328â—¥
FSU score 2633â—¥
TS score 3711â—¥
Summarize
The two parts of the World of Warcraft (25601440) test, one part is to drive the default special effects (5 files without anti-aliasing), and the most high-end special effects (10 files without anti-aliasing) contrast, part of the most high-end effects plus type Anti-aliased contrast. PS game data recording software is "Gaming Plus", may be the software's own problem, the occupancy of the RX470 graphics card memory is not accurate, here please note that the entire game did not burst memory, the game test site is "Storm Tsuen Wan."
Five files without anti-aliasing 25601440 record, record duration 37′59′′
Ten files without anti-aliasing 25601440 records, recording duration 42'50"
Here, chaos into the 1920-1080 resolution ten files without anti-aliasing to run the childbirth
(This ran-off location is not a comparison of the locations of Ironforge-Tibetan Bay (flying). You can be hungry if you look at it.)
From the above test point of view, RX470 can be competent World of Warcraft 10 file effects without anti-aliasing, then join the anti-aliasing will happen? Considering the playability of actual games, we have posted two anti-aliased scores here.
1, 10 files + CMAA, test duration 48 minutes
2, 10 files + MSAA 8X, testing time 38 minutes
OK, you have already seen the game stalls and anti-aliased running points.
From my summary of the map, it can be seen that the RX470 is quite satisfactory for the operation of World of Warcraft 7.0 at a resolution of 25601440. In the case of ten files without anti-aliasing, most of the scenes can be maintained at 60 frames. Smooth frame number. Even when two more commonly used antialiasings are added, smooth operation can be basically guaranteed. We can see that the fluency of CMAA is obviously better than FSAA (FSAA anti-aliasing effect is slightly better than CMAA), so in this regard, I recommend everybody to be a Warcraft player. If you choose RX470, you can run it in the top ten of 25601440. Add CMAA effects to ensure full use of graphics performance while maintaining smooth performance. If ten players with a resolution of 1920,1080 can consider running World of Warcraft in ten files plus FSAA 8X special effects to ensure full use of graphics performance while ensuring smooth performance.
This time may have some friends to ask, why choose MSAA and CMAA these two anti-aliasing it? Next we reveal the answer.
This is the number of anti-aliasing frame test statistics I performed in the same scene.
The effect of anti-aliasing alone is of course the higher the better, but in fact, I personally think that MSAA 8X has been difficult to distinguish, and although the CMAA is directly different from MSAA, there is a clear difference, but it is also in my personal ability. Within the scope of tolerance, the fluency of the game must be given priority over the picture. So I still recommend CMAA anti-aliasing for the RX470.
PS I originally wanted to use the picture to show everyone else, but unfortunately the picture is too big and the distortion is obviously suppressed.
Watchman Pioneer's beautiful picture quality, low-effect AMD's A10 series APU can even play, but the top special effects, especially the high rendering of the graphics card requirements can be quite abnormal. Taking into account the performance of the RX470, we only tested the high-efficiency, extremely high-efficiency, and ultra-high-efficiency under the 100% rendering of the 25601440 resolution. Other settings are default.
First of all, let's take a look at the performance of the RX470 under high effects.
Then very high effects
Last super special effects â—¢
We all know that for first-person shooters, the basic requirement is to keep the frame rate above 60 frames. Many professional players need a 144HZ display, so the requirement for the frame rate is even higher, and even need special effects to maintain high frame rate. run. If you are a professional player or a folk god, consider whether this RX470 can give you the record you want. If it is a casual player, or the requirements for special effects are not high, the RX470 can fully meet the requirements of the players. Next we take a look at the summary map
The reason why I recommend extremely high special effects is not just that the frame rate is higher than 60. The more important reason is that the difference between extremely high effects and super special effects is not obvious, as can be seen from the shadow of the black lily face in the above figure. High effects and extremely high special effects are obvious, and there is no difference between extremely high special effects and super high special effects.
Taking into account that most players still use 1920×1080 resolution, this is still the RX470’s running frame performance with 100% rendering at 1920×1080 resolution, but it is for reference only by players and no additional comparison is made.
The end of the game test, after school time I thought of a problem - noise. I purchased a public version of the RX480 in July. One of the most important reasons for it was that it was almost unbearable when it was full. With this in mind, I made up my mind and wanted to test the noise of this non-public RX470.
Because there is no professional equipment, I use my own iphone6S mobile phone with noise measurement software to test, do not avoid other factors when testing interference, in addition to the video fan all fixed frequency.
The first is the off state, and the white noise in the room is 48dB.
Then the boot state, but this time the load is not high, the graphics card fan is stopped, it can be said at this moment is the entire system noise 58dB
Finally, the noise at full load, the fan at this time exceeded 2500 rpm and 64dB.
Next, we will summarize the noise. We have already begun to understand the feeling of how much the noise is.
From the above figure, we can see that at full load, the whole machine has reached the edge of noisy, but as far as my own supervisor feels, no matter whether the headphones or the speakers are playing games, they will not feel noise, but they are relatively quiet. At the time, the noise of the whole machine was obvious. Of course, the noise intensity of the computer's incoming ear will not be as high as 64dB (10cm near the video card in the mobile phone, and I have a distance of about 1m from the video card, and the chassis is not installed on the desktop), if it is muted The chassis, or the case is placed under the table, the noise problem will be greatly improved.
Overall, the RX470 gave me a good feeling. Under 25601440 resolution, most online games are still enough. 19201080 is believed to bring about a better experience. However, I would like to say to 4K resolution, large-scale stand-alone gamers that starting this RX470 is not sensible, and the choice of facing fluency and special effects is still very tangled.
Cost-effectiveness is a problem that many players care about, and they always want to buy more performance with less money. So what's the price/performance of this RX470? I brought three video cards, one is RX480, one is GTX1070, and one is today's RX470 (I have tested these three), the test software is 3DMARK, because 3DMARK GPU score can still be more objective The reaction of the performance of the graphics card, I will not be on the map, see the summary map directly â—¢
Price/performance = 3DMARK four total points / price, through this formula we can draw a 3DMARK score for each dollar, we can see that even if this RX470 up to price 1649, its 3DMARK score for every dollar bought is the most.
Of course, I don't need to pay too much attention to the value of this thing. What's more important is how much performance you need. If the price/performance ratio is too high to satisfy the demand, the price/performance ratio is meaningless.
Finally, the RX470, which is the most worthy graphics card to be purchased at the current stage of the AMD Polaris series, is still worth checking out in comparison with the GTX1060 3G. If you like AMD, like online games, and hold a friend who wants to buy graphics cards around 1500 yuan, this RX470 must be your food. Of course, as mentioned above, friends with 4K resolution and large stand-alone computers still need to think carefully before starting. Well, as of the end of the test, I hope to be helpful to your purchase.
Thank you for watching.
Vacuum tube collectors include CPC Solar Collector, U-shape solar collector without CPC, heat pipe vacuum tube solar collector, LPC open loop collectors. No matter pressurized or non-pressurized collectors, they are called vacuum tube solar collector once it consists of all glass Vacuum Tubes.
CPC solar collector is the highest efficiency among all vacuum tube solar collectors.
Advantages
and benefits
- Short installation times due to complete pre-assembled collectors.
- Simple and reliable connection technology in order to extend several
collectors side by side through pre-assembled screw connections. Further
tubing and an extensive thermal insulation is not necessary.
- Integrated return pipe and highly efficient thermal insulation.
- Manageable module sizes for a very high performance and a quick and
easy installation.
- Flow and return pipes may be fitted on the left or the right side of the
manifold.
- High flexibility due to the different widths and lengths of the
collectors.
- Quick and easy exchange of the evacuated tubes without using any tools.
Vacuum Tube Solar Collector,Vacuum Tubes Solar Water Collector ,Vacuum Tube Heat Solar Collector,Evacuated Vacuum Tube Solar Collector
Linuo Ritter International Co.,Ltd , https://www.lnrtsolarenergy.com